The topic sentence is well structured as it captures the main objective to be accomplished. It is important to the main object in the topic as it informs readers of the contents of the paper. The outline introduction is also well written as it contains details about Kudler Fine Foods. However, there is a need to state the contracted firm which will carry out the training needs analysis. Therefore, in this case it is essential to state that Kudler Fine Foods contracted Iwamoto Crew & Coe to evaluate the alignment of its` performance system to the strategic plan. Otherwise, the steps of training needs analysis are discussed in order and in a manner that makes sense.The reasons for carrying out proactive training needs analysis rather than reactive training needs analysis are also clearly stated. Therefore, the reasons strongly support the writer`s choice of carrying out proactive training needs analysis. The conclusion should restate the main ideas in other words. This has been obtained to some scope. This is because some essential ides such as the steps on training needs analysis have been left out. Nevertheless, the paper is generally good and captures the necessary information.
I have a positive attitude towards peer review process. It is very difficult for individuals to spot all the mistakes. Through peer review process, a fellow peer is able to detect mistakes that an author did not detect. There is also a high probability of identifying mistakes. It is very essential to detect mistakes so as to offer timely advice and encouragement. Reviewers are anonymous, and this reduces the chances of biasness and unnecessary criticism. In addition, peer review process promotes professionalism as it can be used to detect falsification.
All in all peer review process is important as it enhances quality work. This is because mistakes can be identified and corrected early enough.
References
Hames, I. (2007). Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice (Illustrated ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Shatz, D. (2004). Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry (Illustrated ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
