The abolition of the slave trade in Britain between 1750 and1920
Historians agree that changes in the Atlantic world contributed to the abolition of the British slavery between 1750 and 1920. Modern historians treat slavery with the consideration of the capitalist world, which include its tassel and in classical ruins that played a critical role in European education. Hochschild was responsible for labeling these societies. In Hochschild’s theory, the slaves practiced productive labor, and slave labor was highly significant the state and the society. Slavery was present in the key industrial societies. The prevalence of slave labor made some European states create reservoirs of people that could offer them their requirement of developing colonies. In some societies, the British used slaves in distinct ways. Productive labor was as significant as the public works labor, although slaves were also used as soldiers, merchants, administrators, concubines and servants. In societies with dense populations like China, British slavery was not an efficient method of meeting the requirements of labor, but it was significant in meeting the critical requirements in the society and state. In such populous states, slavery was significant in meeting the desires of powerful and wealthy people. There will be a review of the early state of slavery in Britain, and a review of the slave trade in the early nineteenth century slave trade.
The early state of British slave trade
Several historians of the slave trade abolition concur with Hochschild observation that the spread of moral convictions could take priority over material welfare. These scholars say that abolitionism is brought by new morality that encourages reformers to marshal into new demands and methods that can halt slave trade. Other scholars say that the upheaval in Caribbean Island of Saint Domingue led to the abolition of the slave trade. These scholars identify the British legislation did not end and the slave trade continued until the nineteenth century. There are some historians who argue that the slave trade is still evident; they say that it has just altered in character and form. Philip Morgan, a scholar of Hopkins University argues that there was moral revolution in the late eighteenth century, in Britain. Unlike numerous periods of essential change in history, this turmoil took place within people’s minds. Consequently, numerous British had intellectual and spiritual change that made them have empathy with the victims of the slave trade. Fergues argues that the grave fatalities that the new movement brought to the European powers initiated the abolition of slavery in the Caribbean.
A scholar from the University of Pittsburgh, Seymour Drescher looks at the practical procedures of the moral revolution and how abolitionists mobilized themselves in innovative methods that challenged the British involvement in a superior cause. Drescher argues that new communication networks that were forged by petitions and newspapers were the ideas that contributed to the triumph of the abolitionists. Claudius of West Indies University rejected most arguments from Drescher and Morgan. Claudius suggests that radical emancipation among the Caribbean slaves initiated the abolition of the slave trade early nineteenth slave trade. In the 1790s, African slaves decided to destabilize plantation slavery by revolting against their Caribbean masters and defeating the slave scheme.
Between 1500 and 1800, the Atlantic slave trade initiated by the British moved roughly ten million African slaves to America. This remade the economic, political and social worlds of the Atlantic in progress. For centuries, inland societies and African coastal societies changed in ways that challenged and complemented the unflagging of American and European demand for slaves. In the modern world, communities that are enslaved in South and North America plus the Caribbean continued to develop vividly with cultures that ingeniously constrained the atrocious coercion pressures while reserving the critical elements of collective heritage. The growth of plantation complex created four different continents in the Atlantic world.
The efforts to do away with the Atlantic trade after 1807 initiated another enormous change on the institutions and the communities of the Americans, Europe and Africa. The impact of the abolition campaigns were prevalent, but the there was uneven termination of the Atlantic slave trade. While the 1807 abolitionist legislation was passed, the trade of Africans from Africa to America did not cease to exist. This took some time to diminish without resurgence. Abolitionist enforcements from America and Europe had numerous resistances including common mistrust of each other’s naval forces. There were also resistances from noncompliance and noncooperation from various nations. The years between 1807 and 1867 resulted to the transfer of over two million slaves in the Atlantic.
In the Americas and sub-Saharan the abolition of the transatlantic trade changed demography, economics, social relationships and politics in the sections that received or supplied slaves in the eighteenth and nineteenth century. David Gordon surveys the vivid costs of the actions taken by England in 1807 on central Africa. This is a division that had the highest supply of slaves in Angola and Congo. Gordon argues that the 1807 effects the British patrolling in the Atlantic moved the Brazilian and Portuguese merchants to the south. This movement matched with the British investment in legal trade in the ports of new Atlantic. It also resulted to the regional alterations in slavery, the dependency nature political leadership that initiated the emergence of warfare and urban settlement.
In comparison, Hochschild examines the legislation effects that were against the slave trade in Atlantic on the inhabitants of the Gold Coast. He makes a conclusion that those who lived in areas of slave supply were highly shocked after 1807. This is because the slave ships resulted to the loss of almost half of their trades. The political restructuring of the interior and coastal inhabitants and centralized states after abolition were initiated by the abrupt disturbance of commerce. There is another adjustment form among the occupants of slave supply regions. A quick commerce in palm oil displaced the redundant slave trade, which initiated the creation of fresh inland producers who processed palm oil. The lack of centralized interior states made the Biafra people adapt effectively and quickly to a justifiable system of exchange that resulted to increased imports after 1807.
In the British slavery systems, the legal systems and trade practiced a significant role in encouraging and protecting the use of slaves. However, slavery was not significant in the functioning and structuring of the state. This condition was not the same as the other earlier slave states. For instance, the slave trade in Middle East, engaged a comparatively number of people meant for prolific labor. The slaves got from Africa and Eastern Europe was used as servants, soldiers and concubines. The state used the slaves more than the rest. Slaves received the best training, and they constituted the most significant military entity. Some slaves and eunuchs also played critical roles in the government. The Ottomans considered slavery as a way that the state and the court reproduced itself. The princes were concubine’s sons and their mothers managed their careers. The corps of eunuchs and the elite Janissaries were able to rise to power and wealth with the help of slavery. The slaves in the pre-capitalist system were significant as part of structure of the state than as productive labor.
The early state and the slave trade
The states have evolved from decentralized stateless societies to chiefdoms then early states. These transitions were not easy and took a long period. The chiefdom is usually pretty small. The early state imposed territorial and political links on kinship and has a structural administration. The chiefdom is often prone to fission that is controlled by the early state via bureaucracy. In Britain, it was illegal to sell slaves born in the house. The European slave traders tapped slaves who were mostly outcasts, witches, criminals or the chief’s enemies. There was a slow impact of the slave trade, although the long-term impact was critical. As the slave trade got popular, the people at the coast learned how to defend themselves. This means that the slave trade got deeper. While the slaves in the 15th century were majorly from the coast, by 18th century, there were more slaves from the interior. The merchants also got effective on how they transported the slaves on foot. The merchants used various mechanisms to extract the slaves.
The slave trade in Central Britain was ambiguous. There were institutions that would transfer people as slaves or pawns. The institutions were vital in eliminating the undesirables, but also developed relationships on wealth and power. The data from Central Britain were critical in developing their divisive argument that slavery in Britain involved reduced marginality. The growth of states in the region involved the attempt to control adversary lineages.
With the British slave abolition in 1807, there was a continuing closing of the slave trade in Britain. The impact was not to cut down the use of slaves in Britain. The effect was to increase the use of slaves for several reasons. The first reason is that the states depended on slaves for multiple purposes. The slave trade that engendered warfare restricted the possibility of recruitment of labor. The abolition was connected to the industrial revolution that raised the demand for African products like gum, ivory, palm oil, coffee and sesame. After the British abolition of the slave trade, the slaves were now affordable, but the slaves got expensive in 1830.
The Empire of Britain was victorious, but there were profound impacts of conflict in Britain and abroad. Europe was in ruins and the British host or armies in the Soviet Union, and the United States had changed. Britain was almost bankrupt. There were movements of anti colonialists in Britain and Europe. There was Cold War in rivalry on Soviet Union and the United States. The British Empire had a grace period to leave its colonies, and Britain decided to make peaceful agreements with its colonies. The British resolved to defend the rest of the overseas territories when Argentina attacked Falkland Island. Britain’s military reaction to retake the Island was seen to have contributed to overturn the trend in the status of United Kingdom as the world’s superpowers.
Conclusion
Historians continue to explore the countless ways which the reminiscence of slavery influences the modern day. Scholars have continued to examine how communities and individuals recall slavery. Scholars have also continued to engage the connections between the past and the present. These scholars have found themselves spanning in several spheres of human rights, politics and public service. For these scholars, their key interests were examination of how their research relates with political and social realities in the modern world. Scholars such as Patterson Oliver of New York University argue that the abolition of British slave trade gives an instance of solemn reflection rather than celebrations. He recommends that scholars identify the accomplishments of the victims of British slavery. Although slave trade had been abolished, the legacies continue to influence the world views, assumptions and attitudes of the slaves and oppressors in the modern world.
Bibliography
Beatriz, Mamigonian. "In the Name of Freedom: Slave Trade Abolition, the Law and the
Brazilian Branch of the African Emigration Scheme (Brazil-British West Indies, 1830s-
1850s)." Slavery & Abolition 30, no. 1 (2008): 41-66.
David, Eltis & Stanley, Engerman. "The Importance of Slavery and the Slave Trade to
Industrializing Britain." The Journal of Economic History, 2000: 267.
Hochschild, Adam. Against All Odds. The first great human-rights campaign -- the movement to
end slavery in the British Empire -- had no business succeeding. But the legacy of its
extraordinary achievement lives on today. 1 1, 2004.
< http://motherjones.com/politics/2004/01/against-all-odds (accessed 2 4, 2013).>
Martha, Katz-Hyman. "Doing Good While Doing Well: The Decision to Manufacture Products
that Supported the Abolition of the Slave Trade and Slavery in Great Britain." Slavery &
Abolition 29, no. 2 (2008): 219-231.
