The Art Market In China Argumentative Essay

The art market in china is full of too many forgeries. Original art produced has become a way of making more money through manufacturing replicas of the original works. It has led to many fake artists using this as a source of livelihood. The art market eventually becomes a place that’s only breeding corruption. It happens when executive business people bride others with the forged art for favors. The market is in a very hesitant stage since most people are reluctant to buy art because they fear buying the forged ones rather than the original ones. The primary aim of this is to reveal whether the art market in china has become a problem for artists or to investors.
As stated above, the art market is placed in a very doubtful stage. Scheming is not an alien thing to the world of art internationally. Specialists caution us that the art market has become very susceptible since it is growing very quickly such that controllers cannot keep up. The response has increased over the years. The wealthy individuals in china frequently try to copy the buying habits of people on the western side of the world. The Chinese people prefer art that is unique in their way. As most of the world prefer Rothko as well as Pollock, buyers from china typically prefer going for old fashioned Chinese pieces (Craig 201).
For a long period, a lot of scheming went unsuspected as art went from a purchaser to another as their prices were escalating. Nevertheless, prestigious dishonors are revealing the degree of forged art and hence creating doubts concerning the bigger market. For instance, a painting of oil, accredited to Xu Beihong was sold in an auction for beyond 10 million dollars resulted to have been made 30 years later after the demise of the artist. The painting was developed by a scholar during an exercise in class in one of the leading art academies in China. On another humiliating incidence, a decision was made by the government to shut down a museum in Hebei. The museum was closed down due to uncertainties that the porcelain vase of the Tang dynasty and almost everything, that is, all 40000 relics were imitations (Craig 156).
Chang Dai-Chien was one of the most remarkable artists of the twentieth century. He was most talented in the work of mastering and created forgeries. Chang's copies were hard to spot for so many reasons. For instance, he had the ability to reproduce works of well-known Chinese masters. His techniques were so remarkable such that when he was in color and ink he could just paint anything. Chang’s output traversed a vast variety of archaizing artworks based on the first Chinese masters’ paintings to the creation of the late works using the western intellectual art language. Secondly, he was much keen on the supplies he used. Like he could study brushes, ink, seals, pigments, paper, scroll mountings and seal paste in exacting a detail. Thirdly, Chang regularly forged art based on portrayals in collections of missing paintings. His paintings are bought as new paintings by many key art museums in America.
Chang's work had earned a lot of value over the years. He has been crowned the top most auction earner in an auction market in the previous years. According to research in France, his work has earned more revenue compared to Andy Warhol, Qi Baishi, and Pablo Picasso. Even when he was alive, his works were still of high value but this didn’t bother him much. Chang had a big heart and always the needs of other people before him selves’. He used to give out most of his money to people who were suffering and kept just little for himself.
Robert Mowry, who was the previous custodian of art of Asian origin at Harvard, said that schemes have always been on the market. Nevertheless, it was that amount that mattered. The zeal of the Chinese people seemed to have been distorted because of the economy cooling and their worry about fraud. The returns have been reported to have dropped in the following years after climaxing in 2011, according to a research organization that deals with the global market. The Chinese government and the auction business have notified that they will remove the exploitations and stop any further harm on the customers’ confidence.
Melanie Lum, who is an advisor on the art of China, said that an enormous number of people in china do not believe in the stock market in their country. For economic prosperity, china has acknowledged that culture is a fundamental area. Then again a lively art market could be an important tool of lenient power. It encourages an opinion on the Chinese society which could be the focus of beauty and esthetics and repelling the global focus on the people’s rights and political issues. China had been challenged with clearing up their art market, however, because of a flaw in their rules that let them pardon auction firms of any accountability if an artwork emerges to be false. This sham assists in accounting for the elevating amount of payment evasions (Swaine 50).
Further explanations of the trend of evasions and delayed payments include occurrences where bidders have buyer's regret. They may also they offer a price to rise the worthiness of and artwork by an accurate artist they gather. Even after factoring in faulty return reporting, the increase in buying art over the last ten years has been rapid, with banks in china government organizations and business moguls proceeding to capitalize on the success. Art has developed to be a form of exchange, and collecting has become so prevalent in china since auctions are frequently mobbed. Television stations in china have over 20 programs that give guidelines on how to gather and recognizing cultural artifacts. Late-night commercials promise viewers fast riches to those who buy two thousand five hundred dollars collection of artwork by previous students of well-known masters.
The ads are something like, purchase today as you can instantly secure return of one hundred thousand dollars. Having so much to lose, Chinese art traders dashed to America and Europe to acquire back Chinese artifacts. Museum thefts have also been on the increase that include Chinese relics. Black markets of relics have developed, with those known as tomb raiders get treasures they can trade by digging them up. The concern in addressing weakness of the market makes it a part of current decision of China to undo ancient laws that prohibit auction houses from the west to the market of china.
Not more than ten years ago, the market of china was not very active. The bequest of the revolution of culture when items that were luxurious had been seen as middle class and red guards invaded households capturing and terminating art. A primary collector, Ma Weidu, who resided in Beijing, described how easy it was to get small relics in 1980s. He got them from people for free and sold them to get cigarettes (Songratz 22). Rarely would he pay a minor fee. The china government lifted the limitations on selling the cultural artifacts. Presently, there are over three hundred and fifty houses that can auction, and that can handle fine arts. They include china guardian and poly international company. They are worth billions of dollars with offices in many cities like New York and Tokyo.
But since the market is growing, so is the vulnerable areas. Manipulation of price is widespread, experts say that as investors and collectors, possibly an investment fund of artwork with big assets in a particular artist, offer work to improve the worth of their complete stock. Other times, specialists say that auction houses toss in false offers. Experts say that flicks art leads to the market’s defaulting problem. Just before the sale, the purchaser may get a collector who is fascinated by a piece then bids for it successfully, but then declines to pay for it when the deals ends. Then, imbursements problems arise since china’s market of art is cautiously speaking.
Art can also be used in very intricate bribery schemes. In other cases, an official can receive an artwork with guidelines on how to place it for auction The ritual of plagiarizing in china shows beyond a modest admiration for their past. It is a form of gratitude that beauty has been seized in a way that is worth imitating. Distinct from the western countries, where new work is greatly admired, the Chinese people value their tradition, and their bestselling artworks regularly pay tribute to those that were made many years earlier (Randy 45).
Art market assists artists to engage and participate in a public dialog. It also contributes to the growth of communities of innovative learning. Art also helps support the formation of healthy communities that can take action. It is also an influential instrument for mobilizing the community. It also assists to forge skills and management in the society. It helps artists to have pride in cultures and local traditions. It gives people the need to want to contribute to the growth and belonging to the society. It assists in giving reasons to people to want to grow their community activities.
The art market is a problem for investors as they have no idea of the market conditions needed to manage art. Taiwan, China, and Hong Kong don't have an art market that is real. There are no operational principles that are observed. In Asia, the purchasing and the trading of art are very active. Since the market information in China does not have a network for communication selling and buying is managed by chance. Hence investing in an art business lacks significant assurances. Due to this lack of assurances investing in art becomes a perilous factor.
In conclusion, art in china is a very potent factor in its economy. If forging previous works of well-known painting masters brings revenue to the economy, it is a very significant activity in the society of china and the world. It is a risky factor to invest in art due to the lack of assurance the selling and buying of art in the country are still active.
Work citedKennedy, Randy. "Is This a Real Jackson Pollock?" The New York Times.Songratz, Rex. "The End of Authentication." Medium. N.p., 17 July 2014. Web. 22 Oct.
2014.Print.Swaine, Jon. "Artist at Centre of Multimillion Dollar Forgery Scandal Turns up in China." The
Guardian. Guardian News and Media Limited, 22 Apr. 2014. Web. 22 Oct. 2014.Print.Clunas, Craig. Art in China. Oxford [u.a.: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print.
Wiseman, Mary B, and Yuedi Liu. Subversive Strategies in Contemporary Chinese Art. Leiden:
Brill, 2011. Print.