The Drawn and the Saved is a book with stories focusing on the life in the extermination camps. It is written by an Italian-Jewish author Primo Levi who draws on his personal experiences as Auschwitz’s prisoner. He was imprisoned in a concentration camp belonging to Auschwits in 1944 where he survived the vicious experience. In his book Levi uses himself as an ideal example where he defines his concerns with concentrationnaire’s universe and all its inhabitants both the dead and the living, he survived the wrath (Levi 34). He begins illustrating the whole concept by defining the problem of truth, memory and various ways that are obscure and simultaneously unearthed through mendacity and denial for assurance.
He categorically continues to illustrate all these activities by creating step by conscientious step the stratification and the useless violence by the camp’s authorities whom employed violent behavior that served nothing else but pain. He reasons that “to survive, you do not have to be braver or stronger than those who perished, you probably are more fortunate” (Levi 76). He states this when he reflects back and remembers the survival tactics he applied in his life. It was survival of the fittest where those who dared to try to be brave, escape or rebel suffered the consequences, and weren’t’ successful. They were gravely punished or murdered for going against the rules.
He notes that those who were lucky enough to survive endured by not sharing their atypical fondles of good fortune with others and by keeping secrets. In states in chapter two that he at one point found a busted pipe that had been damaged in a crematorium building. Finding this busted pipe was a precious gift of a bright day. He drank the water and shared the busted pipe with his only trusted friend which later haunted him for failing to tell his other accomplices of the rare gift. Levi resents that these predicaments and is astonished that most of his accomplices thought he was willing to forget and forgive the Germans who strongly fought against the Jews. He makes it clear that this notion should not spill over into hatred and that he has no desire for forgiveness what come may.
Primo Levi in his discussion articulates controversial/analytical concepts such as shame, gray zone and useless violence. He illustrates these aspects accrued from his experiences explaining human behavior at the time of liberation or in the camps.
Gray Zone
In chapter 2, Levi explains the life in the endless roll calls and at large the pointless work that was meant to humiliate and cause more harm than good. His definition of “gray zone” is an area in which survival particularly from the Holocaust was achieved through participation. The Gray zoners’ followed their instincts for survival which to a great extent burdened them with extra hardship. He challenges the tendency to gross over over-simplify unpleasant truths in the hierarchy of the inmates that was developed in the camps. This hierarchy was personally aggravated Nazi’s methodology. He further elaborates that the good and the honest were victims of circumstances and were the first to perish. He tells us this from a survivor’s perspective who is trying to understand the reasoning of a scientist who is solving a problem soundly but in the real sense is trying to pass judgment on certain individuals. He makes his profound changes known which during, before and after the tribulation to him. Levi draws round the coercive conditions which make people inhumane and cause them to become very downhearted to appoint of harming each other. He says that such an act of violence could happen again though it doesn’t have to it is so unfortunate that it actually happened (Levi 42).
Shame
Chapter 3 of the book is seemingly the most moving and profound section where Levi talks of “shame”. He starts by discussing a particular phenomenon that occurred after they were finally liberated from the camps. He continues to state that the majority of the people who had been imprisoned were either profoundly depressed or committed suicide. He attributes all these two feelings of guilt and shame. To affirm this statement, he quotes that “coming out of the darkness we suffered the consequences due to the perception of being murdered” (Levi 93). He notes that their moral yardstick had drastically changed and further than that, everyone one of them lived in their stead and at one time assumed their neighbor.
Useless Violence
Levi notes that his imprisonment was more torture and suffering “useless violence”. This torture was based on nothing and any prisoner found doing something odd was given a thorough beating. This suffering was not justified at all in fact it was inhumane and unreasonable. Things in this camp were very different from the outside world in many instances, prisoners who acted right were victims of circumstances, they were beaten up, given terrible tasks and others were killed. Full of hatred, German people of the Nazi era acted in selfish acts. Any prisoner found to collaborating with the gray zone was dehumanized too and did pay for their foolish acts. At some point, he stated “one must beware of stereotypes and hindsight”, this means that in the cause of life, we all should focus on what lies beneath us and those around us. This statement is more of a parable than just a statement. Error consists in judging distant places and epochs and when focusing on the future, “we are no better than our fathers” (Levi 111). This could mean than although we may appear intellectually fit and much informed than our parents, we just cannot determine our future. Levi’s situation was so adverse to a level where he could not trust to anyone or anything if he was to see a new day.
The terms used by Levi to define the life in the camps are sincere and real. For instance when he speaks about useless violence, it clicks in our minds the extent to which mankind is abused and degraded. This term “useless violence” is used accordingly to illustrate the situation in such kinds of environment. The strength in this term is appropriate and justified in all angles. Life in the camp where Levi and his accomplice were detained was no joke. He notes that “it is the sommersi the drowned or the submerged whose lives are a testimony to the annihilation, terrible truth and the final solution” (Levi 122). His narration serves as a detailed account of the imprisonment which is at times quite explicit and not ones with little faith. Levis ruminations are deep; they literally cut to the heart of what being a human being is, the nature of the political party line, what we value and to a great extent our natural pain threshold. His work reiterates a quivering truth, precisely in the “unnecessary violence”, he introduces the subject of methodical cruelty against slave workers and camp prisoners. Subsequently, works are said now because there were no chances speak them out before.
Analysis
The chapter on the “Gray Zone” discuses the moral ambiguities occurring in the camp. It is a reflection of the moral integrity that has b become impossible due to certain conditions such as cohesion diminishing in the society. It puts emphasis on the rising levels of moral ambiguity. It highlights the language barrier particularly in the large. Levi therefore implores us the perpetrators of the unfortunate events as he brings to light to dehumanizing nature of the perpetrators ‘the Holocaust’.
“Useless violence” is mainly a differentiation of useful and useless forms of violence. Levi notes that burning and gassing of the victims was quite useful since it was a way of furthering their goal. On the contrary, actions such as the defilement of the homes of the displaced Jews and the mandatory military-style making of the beds should be considered useless as they do not fall into this rational framework. He later notes that the totalitarian system was fully responsible for the proliferation of unfortunate level of the massacre witnessed. Levi posits that remembering these issues (grey zone and the useless violence) is painful and difficult to remember. It was very unfortunate that the prisoners who expected to find refuge from their fellows on arrival were in for a rude shock as they were either betrayed or beaten up by their own kind. Despite facing all these, Levi does not judge collaborators instead, he opts to bury the hatchet and leave the dead bury the dead.
The words “gray zone, useless violence and shame” pay special attention to the inmates who had survived the initial selection and continued increasing their chances of survival. His illustration and description of the entire place touches Levi’s heart and the picture he presents to us is never oversimplified, dichotomous or schematic. His words are well selected and defined, as he beliefs that authenticity has a form of prism that breaks down rays of light into special colors. He sincerely portrays some analytical concepts of the Lager phenomenon which appear obscure. He actually wants to assist people today to keenly meditate and ask upon intricate questions which all of us should reflect on (Levi 212). Even after decades of the destruction, the responsibility of the genocide is still here. He reminds us that studying historical facts is of paramount importance and passing them to other generations is of the essence. After learning what happened in the past, we all should reflect on all aspects in order to comprehend. It still remains much for us to read and fully understand what life in the camps actually is.
Human behavior can best be defined by our actions and not our words. A reflection on Levi’s story portrays him, affliction, predicament and misery in the camp. It is a primitive system where human beings have regressed and chosen to live in Stone Age where first kicks and blows were common. Much of the Levi’s description of his experience in the camp would pretty much parallel that of a basic army training. The strengths of his words are more about the present and the future. He concludes by calling for action and wisdom needed to end the threat of nuclear dangers and obliteration Levi exactly knew how difficult it is to accept and understand the ideal choices of other people when their actions and decisions do mirrors that of the majority. It is not the case that all objections are mistaken. In this context, criticism is doing what it often does; it literally has inverted the truth about the romantic notion of the escape and the pressure to escape. The cost of the army of the West has greatly affected ways in which people perceive civilian captives. The term survival needs to be interpreted deeply in a meaning that goes beyond the physical and the tendency to think in binary terms; wrong, good and evil overlooks rational characteristics of the human behavior.
Works Cited
Levi, Primo. The Drowned and the Saved. New York: Vintage International, 1989. Print.
