Reason Why the Israelites Desired for a King
Samuel grew older and thus, appointed his son to lead the Israelites. However, the sons did not adhere to his leadership skills since they were dishonest as well as accepted bribe in the long run. The depiction of the sons in line with perverted justice scared the Israelites and thus, demanded for an alternative leader. Furthermore, the Israelites pose and demanded for an epitome leader so as to be like the neighboring nations which has kings as well. The people feared that since Samuel was growing older, they risk being attacked by the surrounding nations and thereby, demanded for a king who will lead them into battle and bring victory (White, 2014).
Why King Saul was Chosen but Later on Rejected
The demand for a king increase tremendously and thus, Samuel decided to intervene so that God could accept to give the Israelites a leader to lead them. King Saul was chosen more so to lead and direct the Israelites towards the Godly way and regulations. In essence, God directed and emphases that Samuel should anoint king Saul as God chosen leader to lead the people of Israel. God chose him to save the people of Israel from their enemies the Philistines. Furthermore, King Saul was mainly chosen to restrain the Israelites from the bond the individuals have suffered from over a couple of years.
Conversely, King Saul was later on rejected by the people of Israelites in a couple of years during his tenure. The rejection came along during his tenure since; King Saul did not adhere to the rules and regulation that God gave him regarding the pertinent ambush on the Amalekites. God ordered King Saul to ambush and destroy Amalekites as well as possessions but instead King Saul decided to spear the best animals and King Agag in the process.Furthermore, King Saul planned and coordinated a military action on the philistines against the will of God since king Saul was impatient and failed to wait for Samuel instructions.. Moreover, King Saul went further and conducted the ritual sacrifices and requisite rites thus, violating God altar. Since, King Saul decided to perform rites thereby reprimanding the role of Samuel in the long run.
Sins that King Solomon Committed which Led to Division among Israelites
King Solomon primarily depicted as the pertinent and last leader to rule the United Kingdom of great Israel. Furthermore, King Solomon had a number of wives about seven hundred with close to three hundred concubines and the wives played a fanatical role in line with the division of united monarchy of Israelites. Moreover, the wives were from the states in which God had cautioned the Israelites and prompted them from marriage practice.
In essence, the wives turned King Solomon away from God and instead the leader emulated the idol forms and practices. In addition, King Solomon built high place for worship of idols in the makeable and designated places for the foreign wives in the return. King Solomon adopted the makeable rules and practices of Ashtoreth. Ashtoreth is known as the goddess of the people of Sidonians and following the makeable ways and deeds of this god is a violation to the God (Sokas, 2014).
Moreover, people of Molek have the detestable in line with deity of the Ammonites pertinent to the Ashtoreth goddess. In meantime, the Lord was angry with King Solomon for violating the Godly ways and instead adopting the idol deeds. More so, God was angry since King Solomon had turned his soul and believes away from Lord and adopted the satanic mechanisms. Therefore, the good God appeared to King Solomon twice and cautioned King Solomon but the leader was not ready to change and thus, God commanded punishment. Later on, God pronounced punishment saying that King Solomon had failed to adhere to the covenant way of life and decrees in the long run, as agreed by the Israelites during the time of Moses.Thus, God pronounced that the Kingdom will tear apart during to the decrees and deeds of King Solomon. However, the punishment mainly will designate and prompt during the tenure of King Solomon’s sons. God also pose on the pertinent division and said that the division is essential and the leader will come from subordinates since the conferment relationship that God had with King David.
Contrasting and comparing the three Primary Figures in the United Kingdom
In essence, the holy bible on the reserve of Kings depicts on the various rulers and kings. The evaluation of the rulers of the great nations is mostly epitome and illustrated using the Mosaic in addition to Davidic covenants. Basically, the analysis is meant to prepare the exiles to study and learn from the past drawbacks more so created by their kings in the long run. The orientation is essential since it will assist the individuals to deter from future pledge disobedience. The analysis begins by giving an insight on the covenant inspection pertinent to King Solomon in particular. In addition, the reservation explains the logical power and transfer regarding the kingdom more so from David tenure to King Solomon.
Features that King David played which in turn made Him a better King Than King Saul.
King David obeyed God and the prophet Nathan by following the rules and observing the God’s commands on his daily duties. King David constantly prayed and praised God as well as seeks guidance from him in the return. However, King Saul did not obey the rule and regulations outlined by the Prophet of God, Samuel. Furthermore, King David praised God even during the hard times like distress and thus God helped him to excel abundantly.
Comparing: Similarities in United Kingdom
Both books gives the overall effects as well as impacts of war, whether it involves few or many people in the long run. Both the books also gives the depiction and the role of leaders in giving authoritative direction to the people in the long run. The direction and decision can either be for political or priestly values in return. Furthermore, the analysis from the books also examines and evaluates how kings and leaders use moral and spiritual concerns to bring people closer to God in the long run.
On the hand King David from the book of chronicles emphases on the need to have the temple and use it to depict the presences of God in the return. Furthermore, David says that it for the well-being of the Israelites to have a temple so that the individuals can gather there for their weekly sacrifices and offerings to God (Wiseman, 2015).
Contrasting: Differences in the United Kingdom
Generally, the book of Samuel and that of Kings depicts on the divided kingdom while on the other hand the book of chronicles focuses on the Southern Kingdom alone. The book of Samuel in addition to Kings poses on the national and political history in particular while the book of Chronicles focuses on the Davidic Kingdom as a whole. Excludes genealogies essentially, covered in the book of Samuel and that of Kings while on the hand, Chronicles mostly poses on the include genealogies in the return.
Thus, rash decision separated Jeroboam along with the ten northern tribes and thereby, causing Northern people to break away from Judah. In essence, the people rejected the Holy conurbation, the temple, as well as the Davidic streak. Thus, the connection that exists between the two great conurbations primarily destroyed in the long run. The contrasting bit emerges in the sense that, the temple and kings who were meant to unity the people have instead decided to back off and create division of the United Kingdom.
References
Sokas, B. Z. (2014). Rebuilt History: The Significance of the First Temple in 1 and 2 Kings and 1 and 2 Chronicles.
White, E. G. (2014). Prophets and kings. Jazzybee Verlag.
Wiseman, D. J. (2015). 1 and 2 Kings (Vol. 9). InterVarsity Press.
