The Board of Education violated her right to privacy
The Board of Education disregarded Pettit's entitlement to privacy. She had devoted much of her time to work with the mentally challenged children for more than thirteen years and, all through her vocation, her assessments were constantly positive. Her sexual orientation in “Swingers” is outside her jurisdiction of her role as a teacher and the allocated working hours, and she is at liberty to do whatever thing as long as it does not meddle with her performance as a professional instructor. Based on the allegations leveled against her, her sexual activities have nothing to do with her qualifications or unfitness to continue teaching. Conversely, the awareness of the public about her sexual activities will likely damage her reputation and authority from parents or executives. With all considerations, the Board ought to only take action against her if her performance had been influenced. Regardless of her occupation Mrs. Pettit had the privilege to security. The Board of Education violated Mrs. Pettit abused right to privacy. Mrs. Pettit was an educator of numerous years and never had an assessment of her work. What she did outside of work was marked amateurish by the Board of Education and they terminated her since they trusted she was unfit to continue teaching.
Justification of her firing
Based on an assessment of the case, The Board of Education was not justified in the sacking of Pettit. Her sexual orientation was not exposed to the children she taught at the elementary school in any way. The mentally challenged children would not, in any case, be aware of their teacher’s activities. Her firing is not justified owing to lack of proof that she would be unable to continue teaching because of her sexual morality. The assumption by the Board of Education that she would not be in a position to teach because of her lack of good morals did not have a basis and not relevant to justify her relieve off duties. Mrs. Pettit had a decent record, and she did not have any past immoral behavior with any her students.
Federal laws against discrimination
While such contentions issues might be made to build up an association between the instructor's sexual behavior and the nature of her connections with colleagues or general society, it is dubious that such contemplations merit much weight in the dismissal of the teacher. Only to avoid shame, the school could not exclude individuals based on their race, religion, or political influence. While sexual inclinations have not yet been described as necessitating the same protection as these more common interests, the courts have as of late passed laws that ensure and respect human privacy, especially when its intrusion is looked to be made a state of employment at any rate.
Pettit’s behavior unprofessional not immoral
There is wide range of actions that would be considered as immoral for a professional teacher, but living your personal life does not fit the bill. Mrs. Pettit’s sexual activities could only be regarded as unprofessional owing to the fact that, as a teacher, she is a respected member of the society. In regards to her work, Mrs. Pettit received good reviews and rating for professionally teaching the physically challenged children. Her sexual activities were not unprofessional since she was able to separate her personal life with her career. Her actions would not be considered as morally wrong since enjoyed that type of lifestyle. The situation was not like she was engaging in sexual activities with the teachers, children or any of the staff working for the school. Owing to the fact that she did not show any favoritism towards certain children, neither did she disrespect any of the teachers or segregate the children based on their race, sexual orientation, gender or class, she was fully competent to continue with her work as a teacher.
The requisite to particular connection in teaching profession between notoriety would not have any impact on the ability to teach. Mrs. Pettit approval of “partner swapping” would be regarded morally wrong by the society and some people would argue that any person in support of such immoralities would be alienated by the organization in which he or she works for. There are various unethical behaviors that different teachers engage in, but a professional teacher like Mrs. Pettit would not think of engaging her colleagues or students in her behaviors. Mrs. Pettit has proven why she still has the willingness and competency to continue teaching her students. She had done everything she could to help her students learn and assist them in understanding the academic materials she put forth for them (Salisbury, 2008). Basing the assumption from the argument, Mrs. Pettit is depicted as a person who would be a great teacher, if the Board of Education would involve her personal life with the school affairs.
If teachers have good performance inside the classroom, they should not be held to a higher moral standard outside the classroom
In case professional teachers perform proficiently in the classroom, they should not in any way be responsible for being a prototype in their private lives. The most fundamental thing is for the teachers to guide the students professionally through the course (Idzikowski, 2014). As long as a teacher acts responsibly in a classroom, he or she should be given the freedom to interact with the rest of the world in any way, provided his or her behavior does not affect their competency. A teacher ought to be performed the assigned tasks by the school, and their reputation should not be judged on their private lives.
Judgment on competency should be based on job performance
For instance, the former US president Bill Clinton was once alleged to have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, yet he was not expelled from the office owing to his personal life. In the same case, Mrs. Pettit should have been allowed to continue with her job as a teacher. The reality of the matter is that President Bill Clinton lost power and the deserved respect as the president and that influenced his job performance. The allegations did not disqualify the president from serving his people rather involved his private life. The final judgment on whether an individual is competent to continue serving an organization should be based on the grounds of whether the public knowledge of the culprits’ behaviors would in any way affect the job performance.
Learning institutions do not have authority over out-of-school life of teachers
Practices that would show unprofessional or immoral conduct for a teacher
Favoritism
It would be considered immoral and unethical for a teacher to show signs of favoritism towards certain students based on their race, gender or social background. Every student is entitled to equal and fair treatment to the teacher no matter how much the students irritates the instructor.
Lack of respect
Every teacher ought to be respectful to the school authority, colleagues and the students. In case a teacher fails to respect neither the principal nor the other teachers or the students which he or she teaches, the students might end up imitating that habit. The behaviors they learn from the instructors are very crucial since it is indispensable for them to respect their parents, teachers and fellow students.
Segregation
Isolating children regardless of where they are from, race, class, gender or sexual orientation is immoral and unprofessional for a teacher. This is not an acceptable code of conduct to because it can inspire the children with hatred among each other. These children can grow up, and we can have despised violations in this nation where it is a tremendous issue in the current world.
Lying and stealing
These are very unprofessional and immoral manners for a professionally trained teacher. If a teacher possesses these unethical behaviors of lying and cheating, it could teach kids to be tolerable to stealing and lying.
References
Idzikowski, C. (2014). An Essay on Sleep-Related Sexual Behaviours and Offences Related to Sexual Behaviours. Sleep and Its Disorders Affect Society. doi:10.5772/59140
Pugh, D. (2009). The phoenix process: A substantive theory about allegations of unprofessional conduct. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(10), 2027-2037. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05038.x
Salisbury, R. M. (2008). Out of control sexual behaviours: A developing practice model. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23(2), 131-139. doi:10.1080/14681990801910851
