DQ Two Week Six
Leaders are a critical component of society. They provide direction that institution, governments and society at large follows. However, research on whether leaders are entirely born to lead or are made is inconclusive. This is essentially because of the variety of leadership styles and methods that have been employed by different individuals leading to world-wide success.
In order to develop a clear thesis on whether a leader is born to lead or made, it is critical to review leadership training. There has been consensus among scientists that childhood experiences play a significant role in the leadership abilities of the future leader. Therefore, experience, training and background are instrumental factors on the ability, capacity and development of a leader. On the other hand, it not disputable that genetics is a significant determinant in shaping up the character and personality of an individual. It is, therefore, become extremely hard to ether categorically deduce whether a leader is born or made. This conundrum can only be solved in one way. Explaining both birth and training as essential elements of leadership formation. This is vital because they are critical to not only the intellectual development of a leader, but also in ensuring that his or her interpersonal skills are refined to become a competent and able person.
This inference will concur with the significant number of research analysis made by numerous scholars that indicate that leadership goes beyond family genes. Other influences such; hardship, opportunities, mentors, education and motivation have become not only significant, but also essential elements that a competent and able leader must have to succeed. It is vital to understand that there is no alternative for the cognitive process and the amelioration that results from the process.
References
Grabovac, D. (2009). Are Leaders Born Or Made? Lulu.com.
Shriberg, A., & Shriberg, D. (2011). Practicing Leadership Principles and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
