William Lemessurier And His Role In The Citicorp Tower Essay Examples

LeMessurier came to understand that the danger of building breakdown surpassed every single sensible estimate. He advised the building proprietor, conceded the lapse, and worked out a retrofit paid for by his liability insurance and the Citigroup. As Dr. Loui clarifies it, LeMessurier assumed individual liability to ensure general wellbeing of society. The error was mad in the structural design of the Citicorp Tower and LeMessurier assumed liability in light of the fact that he was the technical in charge of the construction of this skyscraper.
LeMessurier assessed his dilemma and he would later relate that he figured he had three choices: one he should remain quiet and let the defects of the building design unattended; second resort to cowardly act of committing the suicide; or third tell others regarding the issue and its gravity. He realized that unveiling the issue could prompt claims or potentially end his career as a professional engineer, however, LeMessurier accepted his personal gains in keeping quite were insufficient and insignificant as compared to his social commitment. So, he came forward and accepted responsibility regarding the flawed design of the Citicorp building and this story was first revealed almost seventeen years later. From that point forward, the activities of LeMessurier have been considered as an epitome of engineering ethics and numerous schools now utilize LeMessurier's story as a case of practical application of engineering ethics.
The engineering code of ethics states that an engineer should make a public statement regarding any issue with objectivity and truthfulness under any circumstances. This code is in conflict with LeMessurier's activities related the Citicorp building. In the light of engineering ethics code, LeMessurier's silence regarding the issue raise serious ethical questions. The defeat in the design was a matter of public wellbeing therefore, an open proclamation ought to have been made. Individuals can't be kept in the dark on the grounds that the management of enormous enterprises concludes that it is best that way. To conclude, LeMessurier did act in accordance with ethical standards of professionalism and engineering for assuming the liability, however, he ought not to have acted in such secrecy regarding the issue.