This article by Kacey Keyko discusses the role of work engagement in the ethical nursing practice. The author highlights that most of the research majorly focus on the relationship between organizational outcome and the engagement while neglecting the ethical considerations in the field of nursing. To address the significance of engagement, the article highlights the conditions necessary to achieve this concept at workplace including safety, availability, and meaningfulness. According to Keyko, nurses must feel safe in their working environment without fear of any harm, and be psychological, emotionally, and physically available (880). The job should also be meaningful in a way that they derive some benefits; these components enhance engagement. The article significantly addresses the relevance of rational ethics in providing a dialogue about ethics in the entire healthcare system. The study is also related to the roles of mutual respect, working environment, culture, and embodiment on the engagement of nurses.
The paper has discussed the outcomes of work engagement in nursing comprehensively. It contends that work engagement is useful in many professional fields and can still be utilized effectively in nursing. The concept of work engagement in nursing is widely misunderstood or ignored across the world. To-date, the concept has not been fully utilized in the nursing profession despite the benefit it holds for the future of the nursing profession. The author urges that existing nursing research and studies tend to focus primarily in the environmental and antecedents of work engagement in nursing practice rather than evaluate its benefits.
Keyko does not ignore the fact that there are studies to investigate how work engagement can reduce the prevailing distressing symptoms exhibited by nurses in the course of their work. Engaging nurses would enable them to love their job and commit to use their skills to the patient benefit. Nurses would feel more appreciated when they are engaged in their practice as it would reduce the prevalence of distressing conditions most of them find themselves in.
The audience for this particular article include the nursing practitioners as well as employers in the nursing field. Keyko describes how the lack of satisfaction in the working environment can prevent nurses from delivering and engaging in their work. Some of the environmental issues addressed include workload and staffing; with the right staff numbers and average workload, workers can perform effectively, thus increasing their level of engagement (Keyko 886). Trust between the stakeholders in the nursing environment is also a fundamental determinant of engagement; this should be among colleagues, the leaders, and the patients. It, therefore, targets the nursing practitioners as it addresses the means through which engagement could be achieved. Keyko may also address all employers regardless of the organization. In her article, she discusses the roles of managers including creating a conducive environment as well as rational space that can help inculcate both body and mind of workers in the provision of efficient services.
The article presents points in a very significant manner. Keyko uses examples and case studies to support his assertions, a phenomenon observed throughout the article. In explaining the role of mutual respect on the engagement of nurses, she first highlights the influence of the concept before giving the example. According to the author, if patients are treated as objects, their respect is eliminated and thus do not value the unique and valuable roles. He illustrates Laschinger’s experiment which proved that the opportunity for control in one’s professional autonomy is directly related to work engagement (885). In exploring the role of empathy on the engagement levels, the author uses an illustration of a short video produced by Cleveland Clinic. The video reveals the inner thoughts of families, patients, and healthcare professionals; it concluded that being in someone’s shoes influences the rational ethics within the nursing field. The use of examples and illustrations in the article aids in the understanding of the concepts discussed.
Summary of changes
The writer proof-read the paper and noticed numerous incidences of grammar usage, wrong vocabulary, improper punctuation, and wrong us of some words. The first change was to run the paper through grammar software to get a glimpse of recommended changes. Afterwards, the writer embarked on a step to correct the words, punctuation, and replace the misplaced words. There were also a small-margin of plagiarism which the writer deleted and read the article to find analytical information to replace the plagiarized sections. The correction and editing of the paper was first part of the assignment that was completed before embarking on the additional one page.
The second part involved an additional one page review of the article by Keyko. After reading through the written review, I choose to settle on the issue of work engagement that was not effectively handled in the written review. I discussed the role of work engagement in the nursing profession with reference to Keyko arguments. Further, id discussed criticism against work engagement in the nursing profession and stated Keyko rebuttal on the said criticism. Work engagement concept holds a bright future to the nursing profession and hence should be nurtured and protected maliciously. Nurses have ethical responsibilities to came up with principles and values that guide them in their nursing practice.
Work Cited
Keyko, Kacey. Work Engagement in Nursing Practice A Relational Ethics Perspective.Nursing Ethics(2014): 0969733014523167.
