World leadership is one of the crucial phenomena that are dictated by various factors. In most cases, people question whether America should be a world leader. Based on critical analysis America should be a world leader. As a matter of fact, there is an inevitable decline of America in many issues, but regardless of the decline it still qualifies to be a world leader. There are various issues that develop in America and find its way to other nations in the globe. America continues to intensify its social relations with many countries in the world through its foreign policy (Patrick, 2002). Advancement of technology is one of the factors that dictate the essence of world leadership. America is well known for its invention and innovation of various technologies that determine the relations of countries in the world. In the general perspective, America should be a world leader because there is no country in the horizon that can overtake America.
America has demonstrated a higher ability of developing a common approach and ideas in relation with other nations in the world. On the same note, individuals in the globe migrate to America to search for better opportunities. Studies show that the transnational labor migration is at increase in America (Niblett, 2010). The diverse nature of America makes them to be a world leader in various issues. America is spending billions of dollars on issues related to security, not only in America but other parts of the world. For example, America has a powerful military and these reasons America should be a world leader (Frankel, 2006). Economically, the GDP of America is very high even if it is compared to other upcoming powerful nations. The cultural diversity in America tends to reduce conflict. These makes America a good example on issues related to cultural conflicts and diversity.
References
Frankel, E. G. (2006). Challenging American leadership: Impact of national quality on risk of losing leadership. Dordrecht: Springer.
Niblett, R. (2010). America and a changed world: A question of leadership. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell
Patrick, S. (2002). Multilateralism and U.S. foreign policy: Ambivalent engagement. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner.
