Part 1
I have noticed that there are significant differences between what I submitted and the model answer provided. The model answer is very specific and straight to the point when it comes to identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the article that is being critically appraised. After looking at the work that I submitted, I have noted that there is a lot of “beating around the bush” and the strengths and weaknesses of the article are not identified directly. In fact, some sections of the work submitted almost look like a summary or a review of the work instead of ...