Facts
Scarborough and Rollins were owners of adjoining land parcels .According to Rollin’s, she believed that she owned a share of ``a gravel road” that was situated along the south in relation to her apartments. On the other hand, Scarborough also believed that he owned the same share of the said gravel road that was situated north of his properties (Miller, 547).
In the year 2006, Scarborough instituted a suit to facilitate the confirmation that the share of the gravel road belonged to him and that he should be awarded ``quiet” enjoyment of the same. Rollins on the hand ``filed” a counterclaim ...