Mutual Pharmaceutical vs. Bartlett: Case Brief and Analysis
Facts about the case Procedural history Bartlett initiated a suit against the manufacturer of Sulindac; Petitioner Mutual Pharmaceutical for various discrepancies including, fraud, design defect, failure to warn, breach of warranty, manufacturing defect, and negligence. Even so, Bartlett’s allegations, which were the purported factual elements that would warrant a legal action, were dismissed based on the notion that they had not doubtful material issues of fact (Shilling, 2012). Nonetheless, Bartlett’s singled out his complain to one allegation, which aligned with the notion that Sulindac was unduly detrimental for consumers. This was primarily accredited to the fact that ...
