As a health care practitioner, am of an opinion that it was right for the center for disease control to immediately take action; since failure to this may have led to the spread of tuberculosis to other people. Mr. Speakers right to autonomy as a patient could not be exercised in this case because such options do not apply in emergency cases like this one. Therefore, he could not be allowed to make decisions on; whether to seek treatment or not; due the harm that he might have caused to others.
The principle of beneficence was applicable by the center for ...
